Do You Agree or Disagree

genetically Modified Food (GMF) has the say-so to resolve some(prenominal)(prenominal) of the human phases hunger and malnutrition fusss, and to jock protect and preserve the purlieu by sum up yield and littleen reliance upon chemic substance pesticides and weed killers. So I think that GMF should be a expert solution for the worlds increase commonwealth. The world population has reached 6 meg people and is predicted to double in the future(a) 50 years. The oft increasing of population will lead to the much requisite of aliment and also the lack of able land for agriculture.Therefore, when the population is growing dramatically resembling this, many people would discover and many children be malnourished beca put on of food shortage. Ensuring an adequate food bestow for this booming pollution is going to be a major challenge in the almost future. One of the most solution for this problem is the GMF because of it potential in work out worlds hunger and m alnutrition. With many kind of products, including potatoes, corn, soybeans, beets, and rice, etc, GMF burn down replace apart of expression foods.Moreover, crop losses from insect pests provide be staggering, resulting in devastating pecuniary loss for farmers and starvation in maturation countries. Farmers typically use many slews of chemical pesticides annually. Consumers do non deprivation to eat food that has been treated with pesticides because of potential health hazards, and run-off of agricultural wastes from an excessive use of pesticides and fertilizers usher out poison the water supply and cause harm to the environment. Growing GMF nominate function eliminate the application of chemical pesticides and reduce the cost of bringing a crop to market.Besides that, for some crops, it is not cost-effective to remove weeds by animal(prenominal) means such as tilling, so farmers will often spray galactic quantities of different herbicides to destroy weeds, a long an d overpriced process, that requires care so that the herbicide doesnt harm the crop plant or the environment. Crop plants genetically-engineered to be resistant to adept very powerful herbicide could help prevent environmental damage by reducing the amount of herbicides needed.The last plainly not least is that GMF can increase yield by using many genetically modified technology. So we can say that the environment can be protected and preserved by increasing yield and reducing reliance upon chemical pesticides and herbicides. I think that genetic design is the inevitable wave of the future, and we cannot afford to rationalise a technology that has such commodious potential benefits, especially in solving the worlds increasing population.Do You Agree or Disagree? whatever people claim that universities should fail the selfsame(prenominal) sum of specie to their students sports activities as to their university libraries. They register out that universities should attract m ore students to exercise, because a healthy body can make believe a student bear the corpulent studies. On the other hand, most people, like me, strongly disagree with it. In the by-line paragraphs, I will explain some main reasons. In the first place, an open-and-shut advantage to spend more capital on libraries is that enormous libraries can help us save a capacious amount of cash, paper resource and the snip to seek study materials from a far bookstore.As we all k flatn, the prices of books are more expensive than before, while we have to read more books to catch up with the high-tech era. Moreover, now many students are still in any case poor to go to school, therefore libraries drop dead the cheapest places to provide useful knowledge for them. still imagine these poor persons can have intercourse a varieties of books in a prosperous environment with passable light and a quiet study atmosphere. How happy they are Secondly, another reason why I disagree is that the chief goal of university cultivation is to teach students working skills.Obviously, libraries provide more useful information to students than sports activities do. For example, more and more libraries are also equipped with computers which can encourage students to surf the Net to discover their horizons. Without the Internet, there will be less chances to make friend with the foreigners and catch the up-to-the-minute worldwide information. On the contrary, sports activities are notwithstanding limited in a menial area and a few of friends in some degree. However, I don not deny that sports activities can provide chances to groom some good characteristics, such as cooperation.But frankly speaking, it is a bit uneconomic to spend too much money on sports activities, when we can attain enough free exercises, such as running, which attract the same advantages as well. Furthermore, students are easy obsessed by the activities and overlook their studies. For instant, I once us ed so much study time to play basketball game that I failed to go up to the side by side(p) grade. Although I earned some awards of basketball matches at that time, I feel very regret. In fact, numerous students have the comparable stories because of he attraction of the sports activities. In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the idea that universities should give the same sum of money to their students sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Nevertheless we are true that both universities libraries and proper sports activities are valuable. Anyway, to rescind students playing overtime and ignoring their homework should be concerned. Is it wise to spend more money on universities libraries?